Why a $15/Hour Minimum Wage?

It’s not enough. It’s nowhere near enough. Labor creates everything of value in the world. We who work should be able to dispose of our full product. Until we are in a position to eliminate capitalism entirely, the working class builds its strength by fighting the bosses for whatever we can get, whether it’s a strike against one employer leading to a collective bargaining agreement, or a demand for legislation to improve wages or conditions for all workers in a locality, state, or country.

If you agree with that already, you are a socialist, and should join us. But read on, because the capitalists have such efficient means of making their interests seem like “common sense” that most working people are not yet socialists. Some have even bought into the notion that a simple reform demand like $15/hour is “too much,” “too fast,” or “not right for here” in Maine. If you have people like that as friends, family, or co-workers—most of us do, so we bet you do, too—here are some facts and figures you can use to show why this is really the least we can demand.

Why $15 Instead of $12?

A coalition of labor unions and liberal lobbying groups put a citizen’s initiative on the ballot this November that will raise the minimum wage to $12/hour by 2020. We’ll vote for it, but it’s not enough. If you believe government inflation data, then the peak of the Federal minimum wage came in 1968, when it reached $1.60/hour, equivalent to $10.78 at today’s prices. If inflation is around 2.7% for the next four years, then $12 in 2020 would be equivalent of $1.60 in 1968. This is typical liberalism: taking pains to appear “reasonable,” very trusting in the government, and thinking working people should be grateful to have things as bad as their grandparents did.

There are several statistical tricks that the government uses to make the official measure of inflation, the Consumer Price Index, appear lower than the prices that take a bite out of workers’ paychecks. The first is the “weighting” of housing costs, which determines how heavily actual rents are counted, versus a fictional concept of “owner’s equivalent rent.” If young people are living stacked on top of each other in small apartments or moving back in with their parents, that supposedly counteracts the double-digit rent increases and the way that purchasing costs for houses have skyrocketed. A wage that could buy a house in 1968 might get you a room of your own on Craigslist today.

The other trick is called “hedonic indexing.” Improvements in the quality of consumer goods are factored in as reductions in prices, even when no such reduction has taken place in the real world. We can console ourselves that we have smartphones with which to browse through the listings of the apartments we cannot afford rather than having to make do with newspaper classified ads to shop for a house.

The demand for $15/hour wasn’t concocted by well-meaning professionals fiddling with government data. It was raised by workers, especially fast food workers, who have been struggling day to day and know what things really cost. But in case you are talking to someone who has fallen into the elitist habit of trusting people with advanced degrees more, there’s a website out of MIT called the Living Wage Calculator. According to their calculations, in a family with two adults and two children, with both adults working full-time and year-round, a living wage in the Portland metropolitan area would be $15.17/hour. If you believe the minimum wage should be a living wage, then $15/hour is not too much, but a little too little, a good start.

Socialize Medicine, Child Care, Elder Care

Why are we using figures for families with children? Not everyone has children. But the wages the capitalists pay us are payment for the commodity we provide them called our labor-power, our ability to work. They are paying us not just to come in today, but to be able to come in tomorrow, and for them to be able to replace us with a younger worker when we’re too worn out to keep coming in. If working-class people can’t raise our kids in decent conditions, who will keep working for the capitalists? Individual, short-sighted bosses—and that describes most of them—may say that’s “not my problem.” But it’s a problem for the working class as a whole.

The United States, unlike most affluent countries (and even some not-so-affluent ones), leaves paying for the care of children, elders, and the sick mostly to individual families. Looking at the Living Wage Calculator again, we see that the living wage for a single adult working full-time is $11.11/hour. But if that same person is a single parent, it more than doubles, to $23.23. Someone has to watch that kid while the parent is working full time, and that’s not cheap. Nor should it be, because if we can’t do it ourselves, people who are responsible for the care of another want it to be done by someone is well-trained and not struggling to survive themselves. If we shared these costs, with socialized medicine, child care facilities, and elder care resources, they would not be so burdensome for individual families, and there wouldn’t be such big differences in living wages between different types of families. We can and should fight for those resources from the capitalists, and we will be able to make them a reality in a socialist society. Until then, we continue the fight for living wages for all.

Training Wage, Tip Credit, Other Boss Shit

We can already hear the bosses’ whines:

Why should I pay so much for someone who’s just starting out? Can’t we have a lower training wage? No. Society already invested plenty of resources in educating people. You can’t expect someone fresh off the street to already know all the details of your business. That person still has bills to pay while they learn the ropes. Maybe if you treated workers better, you wouldn’t have such high turnover.

Then how about a lower wage for young people? They don’t have responsibilities. Bull. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, using the Federal government’s notoriously low-bar definition of poverty, 180,000 people in Maine are poor, 14% of the population. Half of those poor people are between the ages of 25 and 64, and 27% are children. Low wages are not just for teenagers working for spending money. And many working-class young people are working for more than just spending money: They are helping to support their families, or have kids of their own, or are trying to save up money for higher education and its spiraling costs.

The restaurant industry needs a tip credit to survive! The restaurant industry has taken advantage of Americans’ individual generosity to get away with paying practically nothing to its employees. The Federal minimum wage for tipped employees is still a mere $2.13/hour, the same as 20 years ago! In Maine, it’s only slightly better, at $3.75. Working for tips opens workers up to all sorts of abuses: demands that waitstaff “tip out” to managers and kitchen staff, putting up with harassment from customers in fear of not getting tips, or tolerating managerial harassment in order to not get stuck with a bad station. Restaurants in countries where tipping is not customary, like Germany, have found ways to survive and deliver respectful service while paying living wages to their waitstaff. During the Spanish Civil War, when workers in Barcelona took over the restaurants, they banned tipping and all the toadying behavior that went with it. If an industry requires its workers to bow and scrape to survive, maybe it deserves to die.

June 2016


New Name, Same Struggle

The following motion has been passed by the members of the Socialist Caucus of Maine:

“To dissolve the Socialist Caucus of Maine through the following steps:
“1. The Treasurer shall offer individual refunds of dues already paid, making clear to any member who elects not to accept the refund that the funds shall be retained as a Local Organizing Fund by the Socialist Party of Southern Maine (local of the SPUSA in formation);
“2. The website mainesocialists.org, e-mail address mainesocialists@gmail.com, and the Twitter account @mainesocialists shall pass to the custody of the Socialist Party of Southern Maine;
“3. The name ‘Socialist Caucus,’ along with the Facebook page under that name, shall be offered for the use of those former members of the Socialist Caucus who wish to continue attempting to reform the Maine Green Independent Party and the Green Party of the United States;
“4. Each socialist organization represented in the Socialist Caucus of Maine (SPUSA, Socialist Alternative, ISO, and organized socialists in the MGIP adopting the name ‘Socialist Caucus’) shall be invited to select one representative to serve on an ongoing ‘Socialist Coordinating Committee’ with the purpose of organizing joint action in areas of principled agreement.
“5. The text of this motion shall be posted in full on the website mainesocialists.org.”

The Socialist Party of Southern Maine will soon be applying to the SPUSA for official recognition as a local. Please watch this site for further details.

Fight for $15

The Struggle for Jobs for All at a Living Wage

Join Seth Baker, candidate for Maine State Senate District 27, for a discussion of how and why working people across the nation have been fighting for real living wages, and strategies to take that struggle forward in our state.

USM, Glickman Library, Room 520

314 Forest Avenue, Portland

Sunday, June 26th, 2:30 p.m.

Sponsored by:

The Committee to Elect Seth Baker

The Socialist Party of Southern Maine

The Socialist Caucus of Maine

Portland Rally for Housing Justice

Good coverage on the website of WGME:

“People are suffering now, and we need some rapid action now to protect people from being out on the streets,” says Crystal Cron, chairman, Portland Tenants Union.

“We need protections so that ordinary working people can stay in the city they know and love and the city should be for everyone, not just for people who decide they want to come here and make Portland their playground,” says Cron.

Our Youngest Sympathizer

If you attended the refugee rights protest in Portland last year, you may have seen A., my elder kid. This morning we got into a conversation occasioned by her looking at a magazine article about neonicotinoids:

“What is a neon-ick-ot-in-oid?”
“It’s a kind of pesticide that’s also poisonous to bees.”
“That’s horrible! We should just build a big wall around it.”
“Well, some people are trying to get them banned. It doesn’t make much sense, killing the bugs that eat your plants but also killing the ones that pollinate them.”
“We should tell the workers in the factories that make the neonicotinoids what they’re doing to the bees and then they’ll go on strike and tell the bosses of the factory that they don’t want to make something so poisonous any more.”
“That would be a very effective way of stopping it. Unfortunately, it’s not what’s happening.”
“What is happening?”
“When people try to ban them in a town or a city or a state, the company bosses spend a lot of money to lie and say, ‘Oh, we don’t really know it’s hurting the bees. It’s not fair to pick on us and ban our chemical.’ And the workers in the factory either don’t know, or they’re so desperate for jobs that they keep working there.”
“That’s horrible. There should be new jobs for those workers with good conditions that are clean and organic and don’t make things that destroy the earth.”
“I agree. It’s probably not safe working in a chemical factory. There are probably lots of poisonous chemicals that are bad for people as well as bees.”
“Which would be a better job, African Elephant biologist [her current career choice] or factory worker?”
“Probably biologist.”
“Yeah, factory worker is a very difficult job. Especially a long time ago when there was child labor.”
“There is still child labor in some countries.”
“There is? That’s horrible! We should get rid of it all over the world! I’m going to make a protest sign!”
“Sounds like a good idea.”
“What should I make it about, neonicotinoids or child labor?”
“They’re both pretty important issues.”
“Which is more widespread?”
“They’re both pretty widespread.”
“Well, maybe I can identify more with child labor since I’m a child.”
“You’re also a person who eats foods that bees pollinate.”

Ultimately, unable to decide, she went with a different issue entirely, homelessness. Putting the web address for the Socialist Caucus of Maine on the bottom of the sign was her idea, not mine.


Text reads: “Give homeless people a home! Some people do not share your good fortune! MAKE HOUSES FREE!”

– Joseph

Declaration of Principles

Declaration of Principles, Socialist Caucus of Maine

Final, as amended at 4/10/2016 membership meeting

  1. The working class and the employing class have nothing in common: This has been true for the last 200 years or more of capitalism. The threat of global ecological catastrophe through climate change has highlighted this truth, not diminished it. The global 1%, incapable of curbing their lust for accumulation, have sought instead to exempt themselves from the disaster to which they have consigned the rest of us by expanding inequality and deepening exploitation and oppression.
  2. In the United States, the rule of the capitalist class is maintained by a division of labor between the Republican and Democratic parties. While the latter is more likely to give lip service to the concerns of working-class people—deliberately misnamed the “middle class”—and members of oppressed groups, neither represents or defends working-class interests.
  3. Political independence from the two parties of the capitalist class is therefore a necessity in the fight for human survival, dignity, and equality. We will not give electoral or political support to the candidates of the two capitalist parties.
  4. As socialists who fight for the political independence of the working class, we declare these principles to be at the core of what we stand for:
    • Socialism is of, by, and for the working class. Workers collectively create all the wealth, both necessities and luxuries, in the world. We also create, under the spur of capitalist workplace discipline and the fear of unemployment and starvation, the weapons, munitions, fossil fuels, and other destructive products that make our world into a living hell. The working class alone has the power to preserve what is worth preserving and end all that is wasteful and harmful. We have the right to determine democratically how to direct the full product of our labor.
    • Socialism is international. Workers cannot secure a dignified living standard at the expense of workers in other countries. Our challenges are global, and so are the solutions. Border fences and attacks on immigrants and refugees serve only to divide and thus weaken our class in the face of the capitalists’ continuing erosion of past social gains.
    • Socialism is anti-imperialist. War, occupation, and repressive, puppet governments cause great suffering to working-class people throughout the world. Working-class youth, driven by joblessness and desperation in their neighborhoods and hometowns, contribute disproportionate bodies and blood to the U.S. military. Workers in this country will never be free so long as our labor is abused to cast the bullets and forge the chains that kill and bind our fellow workers abroad.
    • Socialism is feminist. Women are an especially oppressed part of the working class, and most often are called upon to perform double duty, unpaid—earning less for the same work as men, then also having to care for and sustain the next generation of workers in preparation for future exploitation. Every form of legal or extra-legal discrimination that diminishes women’s autonomy serves to undermine the working class as a whole. Women’s oppression hinders the fight of the working class.
    • Socialism is anti-racist. Racism—the systematic targeting of non-whites for inferior treatment—arose with capitalism’s birth pangs, through the genocide of American native peoples, the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and the destruction of colonial conquest. It is doubtful that capitalism would have survived as long as it has without the division of the working class created by the illusory stake in the existing order our rulers’ have given to white workers. Socialists fight racism in every manifestation, whether it wears a Fascist’s boots, a cop’s badge, a judge’s robes, or a boss’s tie.
    • Socialists defend the rights and dignity of disabled people. Under capitalism, the label of disability is applied to any person whose body, mind, or behavior is in some manner less than ideally suited to being exploited profitably by capital. Socialists defend the rights of disabled people to full political participation and equal human dignity, to rewarding work and to a full livelihood independent of one’s availability for work. These demands can only be fully met in a society that lives by the watchword, “From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.”
    • Socialists defend the rights and dignity of gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual, and queer people. LGBTQ oppression is one of the ways capitalism maintains its rule. Denial of the human dignity of LGBTQ people creates divisions among working people and reinforces patriarchal family norms. Despite important gains in recent years LGBTQ people in the US, particularly youth and people of color, continue to face horrific oppression. LGBTQ youth homelessness, bullying, and suicide rates are high. Poverty, un- and under-employment among transgender people is appalling. Transgender people of color are especially at risk, facing murder and horrific police brutality. Socialists demand full equality for LGBTQ people.
    • Socialism is democratic. Democracy means “rule of the people.” The U.S.’s system of government was cobbled together by slaveowners and propertied merchants to prevent democracy, not create it. Today, the capitalist class can and does buy elections flagrantly. With the aid of the corporate press and media, it has taken sole ownership of two major political parties, and tries alternately to co-opt or smash any threat of a third. To make democracy a reality, the working class has to create and strengthen its own institutions that can ultimately replace the power of the employers, not only in government, but in the press, media, education, and the workplace as well.

In line with our commitment to democracy, we will work with anyone on joint campaigns for demands in which we believe, whether those people agree with us about socialism or not. We will discuss and promote our ideas on a host of issues important to working-class people in Maine, the United States, and the world. If you do agree with the fundamental principles outlined here, please join us in the fight for a future worthy of our dreams.